-
Articles/Ads
Article CORRESPONDENCE. Page 1 of 4 →
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Correspondence.
' 0 ^
B ^ a £ j > ea ? e # writer * ami shows ^ to to learn that the feet of not ^ any disrespect t ^ allied % tt
PROVINCE m KENT
[ Tip £ 53 D
of liodge atel tn ^^ W banquet yet ifo ^ v 4 H h ^ th ^ ther cohtetapt of thei ^ Brethteni I am ashamed of such Aasohry ) or rather of t ^ Iheyet d ^ f $ t ^& t n ^ aot Md ^^ a mark to aim the shaft of ridicule at ; ; , " Let ws do wriito Miers a & wety ^ and the outward world vnll then admire our Order , instead of Yours fraternally , Warwick , JukjW , 1857 / P . M . & Z .
CAMI > OF ANflQtJIfY . TO THE EDITOR THE FREEMASONS' MAdAZINte AND MASONIC MIRROR . Pear Sift and Brother . - — presume it is your desire that the Meemaspm * Magazine should be looked upon as the organ of the entire Masonic body , and to give to all , irrespective of party , a fair share of the publicity which the columns of your Journal attbrd . I observe , however , in the " Notices to Correspondents" affixed to the June number Of the Magazine , that you decline to report the proceedings of the Camp
of Antiquity , at Bath , on the ground that you can only report the proceedings of legitimate and regular Masonic bodies , duly recognized by the properly constituted authorities in this country . I think that 1 am not asking too much of you , as the Editor of a Journal devoted to the interests of the various Masonic associations of this country , including the Order of Knights Templar , when I express a hope that you will satisfy yourself by an examiuM subject , as to the
legitimacy and regularity of the Damp of Antiquity , before resolving to exclude ail nntice of its proceedings from your columns . At present it would appeal' as though you had adopted the cout-se of the Grand Conclave in opposition to that of the Encampment of Baldwin , which claims to represent the old Grand Encampment of England , without having aseertaiued the true state of the question in dispute between those bodies . This , howeter , would fee an act of partisanship which , 1 am sufe , you WoUld
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Correspondence.
' 0 ^
B ^ a £ j > ea ? e # writer * ami shows ^ to to learn that the feet of not ^ any disrespect t ^ allied % tt
PROVINCE m KENT
[ Tip £ 53 D
of liodge atel tn ^^ W banquet yet ifo ^ v 4 H h ^ th ^ ther cohtetapt of thei ^ Brethteni I am ashamed of such Aasohry ) or rather of t ^ Iheyet d ^ f $ t ^& t n ^ aot Md ^^ a mark to aim the shaft of ridicule at ; ; , " Let ws do wriito Miers a & wety ^ and the outward world vnll then admire our Order , instead of Yours fraternally , Warwick , JukjW , 1857 / P . M . & Z .
CAMI > OF ANflQtJIfY . TO THE EDITOR THE FREEMASONS' MAdAZINte AND MASONIC MIRROR . Pear Sift and Brother . - — presume it is your desire that the Meemaspm * Magazine should be looked upon as the organ of the entire Masonic body , and to give to all , irrespective of party , a fair share of the publicity which the columns of your Journal attbrd . I observe , however , in the " Notices to Correspondents" affixed to the June number Of the Magazine , that you decline to report the proceedings of the Camp
of Antiquity , at Bath , on the ground that you can only report the proceedings of legitimate and regular Masonic bodies , duly recognized by the properly constituted authorities in this country . I think that 1 am not asking too much of you , as the Editor of a Journal devoted to the interests of the various Masonic associations of this country , including the Order of Knights Templar , when I express a hope that you will satisfy yourself by an examiuM subject , as to the
legitimacy and regularity of the Damp of Antiquity , before resolving to exclude ail nntice of its proceedings from your columns . At present it would appeal' as though you had adopted the cout-se of the Grand Conclave in opposition to that of the Encampment of Baldwin , which claims to represent the old Grand Encampment of England , without having aseertaiued the true state of the question in dispute between those bodies . This , howeter , would fee an act of partisanship which , 1 am sufe , you WoUld