Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Aug. 22, 1863
  • Page 3
  • MASONIC REFORM.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Aug. 22, 1863: Page 3

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Aug. 22, 1863
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article MASONIC REFORM. ← Page 3 of 7 →
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Masonic Reform.

The two great reforms required are , a unity of Masonic rale , and the presence of the Masonic ruler in Victoria . Before considering how these desirable reforms are to be carried out , for the information of our country brethren we will submit a case for their consideration , which , when

they read , if they do not at once advocate the two great reforms required , they must be most apathetic in their Masonic feelings . The case we will submit is no fancy sketch , but one which has occurred in this colony , and within a few months . We have no personal feeling in the mattei * , our sole desire is to benefit the Craft , and to write for the guidance of brethren who reside at a distance from Melbourne .

The case we will submit is this : That a brother may be suspended by the Provincial Grand Master of one Constitution , and that suspension may not be acknowledged by the brethren of another Constitution ; and if that brother is a member of Constitution from which he has

any not been " suspended , he can enjoy all the rights and privileges of Masonry if he thinks proper . Does not this point out the necessity of a unity of rule ?

In order that all may understand this important question , we will detail the circumstances to which we allude . A brother holding high provincial rank , under the English Constitution , believing that he had a right to perform a certain duty , refused to permit a brother of superior rank to

displace him in the performance of that duty . The Right Worshipful the Grand Master required an apology to be made for such refusal . The offending brother requested time to consider the question , but the Provincial Grand Master insisted on

compliance with his order without consideration , ancl suspended the brother for non-compliance with his orders . Now , we will not presume to judge who may be right or who may be wrong . That has nothing to do with the question , which isthe position we are placed in , having three

rulingpowers over the Masonic body in Victoria . ' When the notification of the suspension of the brother we allude to had been issued to the English lodges , we heard brethren of high Masonic rank under the Irish Constitution who

requested the suspended brother to attend the opening of a chapter , the warrant of which chapter bore the name of the suspended brother as a petitioner . No , to assume a case , ' and one not at all unlikely to occur : Suppose a brother suspended from

his Masonic privileges by the Prov . G . Master under the Irish Constitution , and let us suppose that he also is < a member of a Lodge—say a W . Master under the English Constitution , and that that Constitution does not acknowledge the suspension ; or , to take another view of the case , that the

Provincial Grand Masters of the other Constitutions do not take any notice of such suspension until such time as their respective Provincial Grand

Lodges may meet , the suspended brother may present himself at the porch of the very lodge from which he has been suspended , and as Worshipful Master of a lodge under another Constitution , demand admission . These errors are easily obviated by establishing a unity of rule in the

colony of Victoria . How that ought to be established will be the subject for consideration in our next number , and we hope that every brother in the colony may give this most important question his serious consideration . It will not do to be

lukewarm . Masonic reforms are required , and the force of Masonic opinion carries us to the reformation of our Masonic errors , and steadily points to the establishing a unity of rule in the colony of Victoria . A unity of Masonic rule and the presence of

the ruling power in Victoria are requisite for the benefit of the Craft . How are these requirements to be obtained ? This is a most important question , and demands serious consideration . Masons have at all times been noted for their loyalty , not only to the head of the State in which they reside ,

but also to the head of the Constitution under which they had been initiated ; it is , therefore , a very serious matter for consideration . How can we preserve our loyalty , ancl at the same time effect the desired reformation of obtaining" a Victorian Constitution ?

In 1855 , when our Canadian brethren sought for a reformation of a similar character , and requested that the Constitutions of the United Grand Lodge of England , so far as they relate to the District Grand Lodges in colonies , should be altered so as to allow the lodges in Canada West , in Provincial Grand Lodge assembled , annually to

elect their Provincial Grand Master , to control the working and operations of the Craft , and through their Provincial Grand Master to grant , not only warrants to private lodges , but , if necessary , to form County or Provincial Grand Lodges in the province ; the United Grand Lodge of England

still retaining and exercising a superior ancl governing power and jurisdiction over the Craft in this province . The Most Worshipful Grand Master , the Earl of Zetland , replied , — " What the governing power and jurisdiction would be , should the former part

of the prayer of the petition be granted , he was at a loss to imagine . This petition was sent by the Deputy Provincial Grand Master , not by the Provincial Grand Master of Canada—pretty plain evidence that the Provincial Grand Master wholly disapproved of it . He conceived that the Deputy

Provincial Grand Master had no right to petition the Grand Master , or to call the lodge he held for such a purpose a Provincial Grand Lodge ; the proper source was the Provincial Grand Master , and he felt that he ( the Earl of Zetland ) , as Grand Master of England , was perfectly justified in ignoring that petition . They asked that the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge should be altered

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1863-08-22, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 24 March 2023, www.masonicperiodicals.org/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_22081863/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
MASONIC REFORM. Article 1
GRAND LODGE FOR VICTORIA ( AUSTRALIA). Article 7
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 8
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 10
THE PROVINCE OF KENT. Article 11
THE PROVINCE OF CORNWALL. Article 11
METROPOLITAN. Article 12
PROVINCIAL. Article 12
AUSTRALIA. Article 13
COLONIAL. Article 14
Poetry. Article 16
Untitled Article 18
THE WEEK. Article 18
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

3 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

3 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Masonic Reform.

The two great reforms required are , a unity of Masonic rale , and the presence of the Masonic ruler in Victoria . Before considering how these desirable reforms are to be carried out , for the information of our country brethren we will submit a case for their consideration , which , when

they read , if they do not at once advocate the two great reforms required , they must be most apathetic in their Masonic feelings . The case we will submit is no fancy sketch , but one which has occurred in this colony , and within a few months . We have no personal feeling in the mattei * , our sole desire is to benefit the Craft , and to write for the guidance of brethren who reside at a distance from Melbourne .

The case we will submit is this : That a brother may be suspended by the Provincial Grand Master of one Constitution , and that suspension may not be acknowledged by the brethren of another Constitution ; and if that brother is a member of Constitution from which he has

any not been " suspended , he can enjoy all the rights and privileges of Masonry if he thinks proper . Does not this point out the necessity of a unity of rule ?

In order that all may understand this important question , we will detail the circumstances to which we allude . A brother holding high provincial rank , under the English Constitution , believing that he had a right to perform a certain duty , refused to permit a brother of superior rank to

displace him in the performance of that duty . The Right Worshipful the Grand Master required an apology to be made for such refusal . The offending brother requested time to consider the question , but the Provincial Grand Master insisted on

compliance with his order without consideration , ancl suspended the brother for non-compliance with his orders . Now , we will not presume to judge who may be right or who may be wrong . That has nothing to do with the question , which isthe position we are placed in , having three

rulingpowers over the Masonic body in Victoria . ' When the notification of the suspension of the brother we allude to had been issued to the English lodges , we heard brethren of high Masonic rank under the Irish Constitution who

requested the suspended brother to attend the opening of a chapter , the warrant of which chapter bore the name of the suspended brother as a petitioner . No , to assume a case , ' and one not at all unlikely to occur : Suppose a brother suspended from

his Masonic privileges by the Prov . G . Master under the Irish Constitution , and let us suppose that he also is < a member of a Lodge—say a W . Master under the English Constitution , and that that Constitution does not acknowledge the suspension ; or , to take another view of the case , that the

Provincial Grand Masters of the other Constitutions do not take any notice of such suspension until such time as their respective Provincial Grand

Lodges may meet , the suspended brother may present himself at the porch of the very lodge from which he has been suspended , and as Worshipful Master of a lodge under another Constitution , demand admission . These errors are easily obviated by establishing a unity of rule in the

colony of Victoria . How that ought to be established will be the subject for consideration in our next number , and we hope that every brother in the colony may give this most important question his serious consideration . It will not do to be

lukewarm . Masonic reforms are required , and the force of Masonic opinion carries us to the reformation of our Masonic errors , and steadily points to the establishing a unity of rule in the colony of Victoria . A unity of Masonic rule and the presence of

the ruling power in Victoria are requisite for the benefit of the Craft . How are these requirements to be obtained ? This is a most important question , and demands serious consideration . Masons have at all times been noted for their loyalty , not only to the head of the State in which they reside ,

but also to the head of the Constitution under which they had been initiated ; it is , therefore , a very serious matter for consideration . How can we preserve our loyalty , ancl at the same time effect the desired reformation of obtaining" a Victorian Constitution ?

In 1855 , when our Canadian brethren sought for a reformation of a similar character , and requested that the Constitutions of the United Grand Lodge of England , so far as they relate to the District Grand Lodges in colonies , should be altered so as to allow the lodges in Canada West , in Provincial Grand Lodge assembled , annually to

elect their Provincial Grand Master , to control the working and operations of the Craft , and through their Provincial Grand Master to grant , not only warrants to private lodges , but , if necessary , to form County or Provincial Grand Lodges in the province ; the United Grand Lodge of England

still retaining and exercising a superior ancl governing power and jurisdiction over the Craft in this province . The Most Worshipful Grand Master , the Earl of Zetland , replied , — " What the governing power and jurisdiction would be , should the former part

of the prayer of the petition be granted , he was at a loss to imagine . This petition was sent by the Deputy Provincial Grand Master , not by the Provincial Grand Master of Canada—pretty plain evidence that the Provincial Grand Master wholly disapproved of it . He conceived that the Deputy

Provincial Grand Master had no right to petition the Grand Master , or to call the lodge he held for such a purpose a Provincial Grand Lodge ; the proper source was the Provincial Grand Master , and he felt that he ( the Earl of Zetland ) , as Grand Master of England , was perfectly justified in ignoring that petition . They asked that the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge should be altered

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2023

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy